I developed this interpretive modality as an attempt to harmoniously blend the cosmological/fatalistic basis of “Hermetic Astrology,” the philosophical/moralistic basis of “Classical Astrology,” and the psychological/situational basis of “Modern Astrology.” I'm pleased with the results, and enjoy using it to assist my clients with their personal healing and growth.
The underlying premise of astrology is that, in accordance with the Hermetic Principle, all beings are integral components of a greater macrocosmic reality. When each being comes into existence (is born), it must fit into the greater pattern of the macrocosm, which can be discerned by the analysis of the Natal Horoscope. The “Interactive” nature of this interpretive modality stems from the interaction between the demands of the macrocosm for individuals to fit into the greater pattern and of the free will and choices of the microcosm (individual). The Imprint of the Natal Horoscope identifies the qualities that we need to best fit into the pattern of the macrocosm; these qualities just do not mystically appear out of the ether because astrology says they are there, they are based upon specific life-events that occur during the time the individual’s personality is formed. Experience has taught astrologers how to identify those events that are the most typical causes behind specific astrological influences. This allows an astrologer to hazard an educated guess about childhood events, sometimes the influences in a Natal Horoscope speak so comprehensively of childhood events that the astrologer can gain a fairly clear picture of what the client’s childhood would have been like to express these influences. But this is by no means an exact science; each individual has his or her own unique method to interpret, internalize, and ultimately express the significance of each defining event and the underlying influences. Please keep in mind that the astrologer is viewing events through a lens that is distorted and darkened by its very nature—the ego-centric perspective of a child with a limited ability to comprehend events, little or no life-experience to provide context for events, little or no control over his or her environment, and an undeveloped (or partially developed) psyche. This can sometimes create a skewed image of the historical reality, but within limits it is very accurate.
However, sometimes this accuracy is not exactly as expected; sometimes the analysis of the horoscope will very accurately describe the client’s childhood experiences, but be off-base in interpreting how he or she developed as an adult. Other times, the analysis of childhood experiences are inaccurate, but the analysis of how an individual turned out as an adult are dead-on. What occurs probably most frequently is that the descriptions of a person’s childhood are distorted versions of reality, especially when it comes to the role of the parental figures in that individual’s life. Frequently, the most lasting impressions that children have of their parents, and the impressions that appear in the natal horoscope, are based upon the worst qualities of the parental figure’s personality. They can be perfectly lovely people who, on a single occasion, acted in a reprehensible manner while in the child’s presence and it is that instance that—perhaps because it was most memorable—the child internalizes and incorporates into the development of their own personality. So sometimes an astrological interpretation will describe the parents as a pair of ogres when they were just plain old everyday Joe and Jane; but the interpretation is still valid because it accurately described the dominant influence the parents had upon their child’s development.
The human capacity for free will is considered to be one of the most powerful forces in the universe; and the human “free will factor” is the primary “randomizing” influence that can lead to divergence between reality and the interpretation of the Natal Horoscope. The perspective of this interpretive modality is that the development of the individual’s psyche is based upon an interactive “dialogue” between the patterns laid out by the macrocosm (the universe) and the free-will and life-choices of the microcosm (individual). This is a vital factor to keep in mind;
No external force or entity in the universe “dictates” our behavior.
While the macrocosm lays out a schematic that defines, in general, the unique place for each individual to fit into the great cosmic pattern, no one is compelled to follow the dictates of that pattern. That is part of the natural give-and-take of the interactive nature between macrocosm and microcosm. For each person and in every instance of each personality trait identified by the Natal Horoscope, an energetic structure is created within the macrocosm that is expressed as an event to stimulate a response that will move the individual’s personal development in a way that fits into the overall pattern.
Each component of a Natal Horoscope can be identified as a specific influence in the life of the individual. Each influence can be perceived as a discrete persona that represents one part of the greater Psyche—the coherent and unified whole of the all of the individual’s qualities, impulses, tendencies, traits, strengths, and weaknesses. Those influences (or personas) that work cooperatively together to the benefit of the individual are Integrated into the Psyche; they are typically known by such terms as: beneficial, benign, harmonious, soft, beatific, strengthening, dignified, easy, empowering, and functional. The influences that are in conflict with other influences, are contradictory, combative, or contrary in nature, or encourage behaviors that do not benefit the Psyche are Non-Integrated; they are typically known by such terms as: harmful, afflicted, discordant, hard, malign, debilitated, detrimental,, difficult, weakening, and dysfunctional.
The integrated or benign influences in a Natal Horoscope represent innate sources of strength and harmony within the psyche, and indicate aspects of the personality that can be counted on to behave in appropriate and positive ways. People with predominantly benign Natal Horoscopes did not face significant pain or difficulty during their formative years and because of that their psyches develop in “normal” ways. They have, in many ways, an “easy life” compared to other people. But they also have little potential for personal growth, and do not have access to the tremendous energy potentials of the other side of the equation.
The non-integrated or afflicted influences in a Natal Horoscope represent areas of weakness, dysfunction, or conflict within the psyche, and indicate parts of the psyche that have a likelihood of acting inappropriately or disruptively. People with predominantly afflicted Natal Horoscopes have usually overcome tremendous obstacles during their formative years and the afflicted influences are indicative of the “scars” on the psyche from that struggle. Frequently, the afflicted influences are representative of behavior patterns that an individual learned as part of a survival strategy while still a child—they may have been functional and appropriate at one time, but once in adulthood, the individual still utilizes those afflicted patterns out of habit, even though they are no longer appropriate, functional, or healthful. These difficult influences represent inner conflict and inappropriate behavior, but they also represent the potential for personal growth and access to reserves of inner strength and energy that is otherwise unattainable.
Nearly all modern astrologers have the conviction that every hard, difficult, or negative astrological influence is representative of both the dysfunctional dynamic of their traditional association and is representative of a potential for transformation, personal growth, and integration. Every afflicted aspect represents both a weakness and a latent strength. It is important to remember this while reading your astrological interpretation:
Every afflicted astrological influence has the capability to undergo transformation from a weakness to a potential for greatness.
At every juncture of our life-path, we as mortal humans are faced with choices about how we choose to express the qualities of one or more astrological influence. This is the “Volitional” aspect of the interpretive modality. The choices we make change the course of our life-path in ways that are both subtle and profound; and in ways that frequently reinforce us for the choice that we made, even if we chose weakness over strength, and experience pain or hardship as a consequence of our choice. It appears that within the human psyche, every time we make a choice regarding a particular impulse or influence it becomes easier to make that same choice in the future, frequently regardless of consequences. The more we repeat making the same choice, the more embedded that decision becomes until ultimately it is no longer an active choice but an ingrained habit that we use reactively rather than proactively making a conscious decision about our best course of action.
Every time the macrocosm asks us to make a choice about acting upon an influence in our Psyche, we have five fundamental options to choose from: we can Succumb to the influence, we can Convey the influence to an external cause, we can Deny the influence, we can Resist the influence, or we can Claim the influence. In the case of the benign and neutral aspects and influences (which are considered natural areas of strength), the choices are fairly simple; to Succumb to or Embrace those influences (although a surprising number of people will Deny or Resist their own strengths due to other, inappropriate, choices that they have made). It is with the afflicted influences and aspects where we face the difficult decisions, and face the most serious consequences. It is in light specifically of the afflicted influences that these five choices become the most relevant.
To Succumb to an astrological influence is to allow it to express itself freely within your psyche and personality without any attempt at regulation, control, or integration. Which is fine if the influence represents a personal strength, and is tolerable if it is afflicted but represents a weakness without destructive qualities (although it limits our ability to engage in personal growth); but if the influence represents a propensity towards engaging in destructive behavior, this choice is tantamount to giving in to your own Inner Darkness. In some situations, this is a slippery slope; you may justify or rationalize succumbing to the influence of an afflicted impulse over a relatively minor event or issue, but that makes it easier for you to rationalize or justify succumbing to the same impulse over more and more serious situations or problems. Eventually, an impulse that was nothing more than an annoyance to yourself or others becomes a pattern of behavior that can adversely impact your life and/or the lives of those around you. This is typically the mechanism whereby perfectly ordinary people fall into criminal, self-destructive, or addictive behaviors.
When an influence is Conveyed, the individual acknowledges the existence of the afflicted influence, but blames that existence upon some outside entity or situation. The person who Conveys their conflicted impulses is attempting to absolve themselves of responsibility for both the impulse and for the consequences of Succumbing to that impulse. “She was asking for it.” “The Devil made me do it.” “They shouldn’t have come in to our neighborhood.” “He made me so angry that I didn’t know what I was doing.” These are all fairly stereotypical examples of someone Conveying their own destructive tendencies. Fortunately, this excuse or life-choice is finding less and less tolerance in the modern era than in previous periods, although some types of Conveyance are still accepted, but now with psychology as the means of providing the excuse; “mental illness,” “temporary insanity,” “extreme emotional disturbance,” “under the influence,” “He has a disease.” In all situations when an individual attempts to Convey their own dysfunctional influences, they are not only attempting to absolve themselves of responsibility for their actions, or to get away with murder (sometimes literally), but they are also absolving themselves of their own power—they are metaphorically giving over their lives and their right to make their own choices to some other power. At some point it ceases to be a metaphor and begins to become the reality—if only in the consciousness of their internal reality.
Some people undergo sudden and violent changes in their personalities or behaviors; they start out being perfectly ordinary adults living a normal life and end up manifesting the most extreme and egregious forms of anti-social behavior imaginable. In nearly every case of mass-murder or sudden rampages (colloquially called “Going Postal”) the news reports the people who knew the perpetrator as saying something like: “He seemed like the perfect neighbor; always so quiet and polite.” Within this interpretive modality, this is the most extreme consequence of someone who Denies the impulse of an influence in their Psyche. Other potential consequences are: sudden and unexpected suicide, a “nervous breakdown,” disease and early death due to stress-related illnesses, self-destructive or addictive behaviors that wind up disrupting nearly every aspect of the person’s life, and the sudden and total abandonment of all of that person’s prior responsibilities and obligations. To Deny an impulse is to refuse to acknowledge that influence’s existence, and refuse to allow it any level of expression in the personality, behavior, or even conscious awareness. While this is an apparently ethical choice, it is extraordinarily dangerous when considering the destructive influences. When a person decides to Deny any aspect of themselves, they do not destroy it, they merely bury it deep in their subconscious and expend vast amounts of their personal energy forcing it to remain there. In Hermetic philosophy, this is called “The Shadow” or “The Dweller on the Threshold.” The energy spent suppressing any part of themselves is bound to that part, making it stronger and more difficult to suppress. Ultimately The Shadow becomes so strong that it cannot be contained or Denied, erupting into the individual’s consciousness, forcing them to Succumb to the influence’s imperatives, taking control over their actions, and behaving in ways that is completely out of touch with their prior character.
A large proportion of the Christian faiths celebrate the option of choosing to Resist the temptation of an impulse and perceive that as the highest good humanity is capable of achieving. It is certainly a more positive option than the previous three choices, but not considered the ideal by Hermetic Astrology. When an individual Resists an impulse, they acknowledge the existence of the impulse, and acknowledge the allure of Succumbing to that impulse, but they consciously choose not to act upon it. Much of the Twelve Steps is based upon assisting someone to stop Succumbing, Conveying, or Denying their addictive influences and to begin Resisting these influences (however the Twelve Steps do try to Convey an individual’s personal power to some “Higher Power”). Most people can live long, productive, and happy lives Resisting the demands of their afflicted influences, but they do not engage in much personal growth, because so much of their energy and attention is focused upon Resisting those parts of themselves that would encourage them to act in unacceptable ways.
One thing that all four of the previous choices have in common is that they are all reactive in response. In each case, the individual reacts—and gives over their personal power and opportunities for personal growth—to the impulses coming from within their psyche rather than taking a proactive stance by Claiming the impulse. To Claim an impulse is to acknowledge its existence, acknowledge that its existence is our responsibility and not anyone else’s, to acknowledge the allure of its temptations, to choose not to act upon it, to accept the validity of its existence, and to seize control of the situation from it. Instead, the individual who Claims the afflicted impulse attempts to embrace it, to understand it, to find its underlying cause, to come to love it, not only because it is an integral aspect of themselves (and hence worthy of love right there), but also to love it because of what that impulse originally provided them. Then, the people who Claim their afflicted impulses transmute the underlying influences in their psyche by learning strategies to address situations that caused the creation of the influence in the first place, by reclaiming the power that the influence has taken, and integrating the influences back into the psyche. In the process, what had been something that was detrimental to the individual’s existence is now the source of some of their greatest strengths.
The option to Claim a malign influence is available any time we are faced with the opportunity to act upon its impulses. These opportunities are most prevalent when the life issues and situations that are tied up with the creation of the influence are experiencing a disturbance, when all the old muck and ugliness of the past is already being churned to the surface of the conscious mind. From an astrological perspective, this typically occurs during a Planetary Transit or Return. Transits and Returns strongly coincide to the occurrence of life-events that can trigger the reactivation of the issues underlying dysfunctional behaviors. Astrologically, the time when life is at its scariest and most chaotic and most painful can be the best time to work to effect positive, lasting change in our Psyche.
